Should critical investigators possess a “presumption of truthtelling” with regards to a claimant’s credibility until proven otherwise?

There are numerous other psychological and cognitive variables that distort people's memories of the paranormal.

Investigators first need to consider the potential for memory bias when attempting to corroborate paranormal claims.

Ascertain “witness suitability” by examining whether eyewitnesses were even capable of accurately perceiving the event in the first place.

To avoid an uncritical acceptance of paranormal claims, one ought to possess the character traits shared by highly effective investigators.

The purpose of this blog series is to expose paranormal investigators to the potential variables that could discredit a claimant’s story.